<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="177" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://www.kiakimamuseum.org/items/show/177?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-10-27T11:59:09+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="173">
      <src>https://www.kiakimamuseum.org/files/original/bb5a91d722cb3cfb2481b082fc737f1c.pdf</src>
      <authentication>955d3ad44552aa21b96697c761fcfcc8</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1078">
                  <text>CHICKASAW COUNCIL

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE
AUGUST 5, 1969, 4:00 P. M.
SCOUT SERVICE CENTER

PRESENT:

R. M. Hunt, Ralph Hatley, George Thomason, Harold Steinkamp and
Jones Iluskey.
FINAL APPROVAL OF GOALS:
Mac Hunt stated that he had some concern about the figures being used for available
boys. Since the last meeting, he had reviewed this information with Tom Wellman
and was convinced that the information being used was the best available.
In the previous meeting some members of the regional long range committee had
questioned whether the 1976 membership goal for the council had been set high
enough since the percentage of available boys served would be lower than the
regional and national record. It was explained that the percentage of growth for
the council would be much greater than either the region or national council. It
was also pointed out that the projected growth would be greater than for any eight
year period in the council's history. The committee members present agreed that
the projections should remain the same as previously approved by the committee.
APPROVAL OF PLAN:

It was announced that the long range plan would be presented to the executive board
for approval on August 14.
Respectfully submitted,

Jones B. Huskey
Secretary

�BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

CHICKASAW COUNCIL

MINUTES OF LONG RANG PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
JULY 22, 1969 - 12:00 NOON - HOLIDAY INN
McLean Street
PRESENT:
Don Flanders
Cecil B*Mer
Snead Clift
A. L. Jung

R. M. Hunt
Wayne Pyeatt
Harold Steinkamp
Billy Bamble
Jones Huskey

Ralph Hatley
George Thomason
Bill Cowan
Tom Wellman

CHICKASAW COUNCIL LONG RANGE PROJECTIONS:
Mac Hunt, Chairman of the Council Long Range Planning Committee, requested that
long range projection sheets prepared by sub-committees be passed out and reviewed.
These projections were through the year 1976 and on membership, units, personnel,
camping and finance. It was agreed that these projections should be presented to
the executive board for approval.
SLIDE PRESENTATION:
Mac Hunt presented a group of slides with appropriate narration to give highlights
of the council's long range plan. These were presented to the committee for approval
before submitting to the board. The committee accepted this method of presentation.
COMMENTS FROM REGIONAL COMMITTEE:
Cecil Bower, Chairman of the Region Five Long Range Planning Committee explained that
his committee was meeting with the Chickasaw Council committee to review progress and
exchange ideas.
Regional committeemen complimented Mr. Hunt and his committee for the work which had
been done and made comments including the following suggestions:
-

Sales committee needed to sell plan.

- How to accomplish must be In writing as well as what to accomplish.
-

Quality items should be included such as National Standard Units and
Trained Leaders.
Matching funds for personnel are available from the national council.
Any problems with united fund will be lessened when their key personnel
know our long range plans.
Our board members need to help united fund more.
Involve key people from major united fund contributors in Scouting.
Formulate program to inform S.U.N. board people of our plans.
Respectfully submitted,

'Jones B. Huskey
Scout Executive

�MEETING WITH DISTRICT CHAIRMEN
SCOTTT SERVICE CENTER
APRIL 30, 1969, 7:30 P.M.

PRESENT:
Clay Shelton, Vaughan Dow, Ma.nley Cox, Larry Hilbun, Charles T)inkins,
Harold Steinkamp, Billy Gamble, Jones Huskey

INVOCATION:
The meeting was opened with a prayer by Billy Gamble,

DISTRICT REALIGNMENT ;
President Steinkamp presented recommendations for district realignment which vere being made by the long range planning committee. All
those present enthusiastically endorsed the plan. Dr. Dink ins felt that
this would be particularity helpful in the inner-city area. All district
chairmen expressed their eagerness to cooperate to the fullest extent in
the execution of this realignment program. Copy of the realignment proposal
is attached to the minutes,

STTSTPTNTNG
Sustaining membership progress and follow up plans were discussed.
Each chairman thought his district would meet its goal.

BOYFOWER '76
Boypower '76 accomplishments were reviewed Indicating that the council
was on target on all goals and most districts were on target, or real close.

GAFF

President Steinkamp gave a report on progress being made on camp
development projects,
NATIONAL JAMBOREE
It was reported that the council was behind schedule in filling its
quoto for the national jamboree. District chairmen were urged tc concen
trate on promotion of this event,

STAFF ORGANIZATION:
The Scout Executive reported on staff organization changes which were
taking place.
Respectfully submitted,
Jones B. Huskey
Secretary

�May, 1969
CHICKASAW COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
DISTRICT REALIGNMENT PLAN

A.

SOME PROBLEMS WITH PRESENT DISTRICT .ALIGNMENT:

- Some districts are too large geographically which means district executive
travels too much.
- Districts which have a definite mixture of disadvantaged area and some more
affluent areas have neglected the poorer areas,
- The present alignment of Negro districts overlaying white districts could cause
the council embarrassment (some could classify this as segregation). This has
been a good plan during transition period but the present plan is now out of
date and expensive.
B.

REALIGNMENT PLANS:
After much research and study by the Long Range Planning Comnittee the following plan is recommended:

The proposed plan will have an advantage over the present alignment as the
proposal is strictly geographical and all districts will be integrated.
Travel required by district executives will be reduced. There will not be
duplication of service with a white man and Negro man serving the same area.
Two large inner-city districts including much of disadvantaged areas.
Would suggest at least two district executives in each inner-city district.
Northwest would include Frayser and Millington with Wolf River as south
boundry.
Southwest would include Whitehaven and three Mississippi counties with
Interstate Highway as north boundary.
The heart of the city area would be added to Northeast District.
Southeast and Eastern would remain essentially same as they are.
It would be desirable to add at least one man to staff immediately when
this plan is adopted in order to have 2 n^n i*1 each of the inner-city districts.
It is desired that immediate executive board approval be given to the district
realignment plan so that all necessary changes can be made by September 1,
1969.

�LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
SCOUT SERVICE CENTER
APRIL 24, 1969, 4:00 P.M.

PRESENT:

Tom Wellman
Gene Pearson
Ralph Young
R. M. Hunt

Ralph Hatley
Melvin Humphreys
Billy Gamble
Wayne Pyeatt

Frank Simonton
Harold Steinkamp
Jones B. Huskey

GROWTH PROJECTION
Three possible projections for growth were presented for consideration of the
committee. The lowest projection would result in service to 24% of the available
boys by 1976. The highest projection would result in service to 33.3% of the total
available boys by 1976. It was moved by Harold Steinkamp and seconded by Ralph
Holley that the long range planning committee reconmend the projection which would
result in service to 25.4% of the available boys by 1976 (25,000 boys). This motion
was carried. Projection charts are attached to the minutes.
DISTRICT REALIGNMENT:
Problems with the present district alignment were discussed and several possible
realignment plans for districts were discussed. After considerable discussion it was
moved by Wayne Pyeatt and seconded by Ralph Hatley that the long range planning committee
recommend the adoption of Plan # 1, which is attached to the minutes. This motion was
carried.
SUB-COMMITTEE WORK ASSIGNMENTS:
Chairman Hunt requested sub-conmittees to complete work on the following assignments as
early as possible:
A - MEMBERSHIP
Using the recommended 25.4% projection, work out projections of
growth through 1976 for Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts and Explorers, and
also for units.
B. PERSONNEL
Determine staff to be needed (professional and office) for each year
and suggest staff organization. Determine office space and equipment
needs.
C.

CAMPING
Make projections for camp participation for each year and study all
facilities including camp location and land needs.

D.

FINANCE
Determine operational and capital financial needs for the total BOYPOWER
'76 program.

�PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS - CAMPING SUB-COMMITTEE;
Melvin Humphreys presented same preliminary camping recommendations which are
attached to the minutes.
Repectfully submitted,

Jones B. Huskey
Secretary

�Z6S

669*5

£'5

12*

590*91

£/?

IS**/

tu't

1961

595

Z6S*S

0*1

621*1

**2'SI

Z/6

Oll'i

ZSI*Z

mi

£15

*I2*5

I'll

60*'l

SH**I

W

909 '9

I9**9

996*

/S*

W*

£-11

9*2*1

9&lt;tt*2l

52Z

6£l*9

2*1*5

5961

90*

150'*

1*

//

02**/i

IU

ZS9'5

5*0*5

*96I

*l*
S6£

1/0'*

il'6

**0'|

60**ll

669

6/*'£

If 2 '5

£961

96Z*£

16 "2

262

56£*0I

169

/«!'$

/«'*

296*

S6£

22f'£

!£•*-

|*|-

£0| '0|

*95

*6t-S

56£

901 *£

11'
I»
^^

211
BT^IP

**2*0I
r T &lt;r v v

295

602*5

£Z*'*

0961

26£

Z/9*£

|£'£

£*£

2£r0|

155

600*5

2Z5**

6561

Sf£

*!*'£

t/'9

519

m'6

1*5

ft/'t

£*5**

956I0

S*£

S0Z 4 £

10'*

£££

Ul'i

£2£

US'£

t*'2

012

&gt;l£

S2£*£

tZ'2-

2££

*//'£

f0£

5****

*961

102**

925'*

Z56I

6/1 '*

5**
f$*

0£2'*

«r*

956*

£*2*

609*»

Uf

*02'*

*6*'£

5561

*2'//

26«

251 *&gt;

09Z**

£55 '£

*56|

6*/*2

12 '/

*££

096 *Z

iff
/tt

6/***

*£0'£

£56*

in

99**2

I*/

*I6

22**Z

fj#&gt;

662**

«f'2

256*

952

/I0'2

19V

£9^

105*9

20/'£

209*2

1561

9*2

191*2

I6'0I

165

5*0*9

m
in

0*9 *f

0&gt;l*2

0561

522

Z26'/

M'/l

/If

&gt;***S

2*1

62*'£

rn'i

6*6*

102

62/*l

I2'|-

65 -

Z£9**

fll

f06*2

119*1

»02

**/'/

IT!-

26 -

£51*£

*95'l

612

m'/

055 '£

952*1

sum
7TKU

96Z*t

m**
ao wvo

*i
II
*32t07a*3

7IDWOD WVSVOKOIWD

SlflCQS

sana

1*6*
£*6*

9*6'

�MEMBERSHIP

GAIN

% GAIN

% TAB

STAFF

OPERATING BUDGET

19.4%

15

$224,000

1968

16,000

1969

17,200

1200

7.5%

20.8%

16

257,000

1970

18,700

1500

8.7%

22.6%

18

300,000

1971

20,400

1700

9.0%

23.6%

20

347,000

1972

22,400

2000

9.8%

25.4%

22

394,000

1973

24,700

2300

10.2%

27.3%

24

446,000

1974

27,300

2600

10.5%

29.4%

26

500,000

1975

30,000

2700

9.8%

31.3%

28

555,000

1976

32,842

2842

9.5%

33.3%

31

630,000

S E R V E

33.3%

0 F

TAB

B Y

1976

�MEMBERSHIP

GAIN

% GAIN

% TAB

STAFF

19.4%

15

$224,000

OPERATING BUDGET

1968

16,000

1969

17,000

1000

6.2%

20.5%

16

257,000

1970

17,900

900

5.3%

21.6%

17

285,000

1971

18,800

900

5.0%

21.8%

17

300,000

1972

19,700

900

4.8%

22.4%

18

331,000

1973

20,700

1000

5.1%

22.9%

19

362,000

1974

21,700

1000

4.8%

23.3%

20

396,000

1975

22,600

900

4.1%

23.6%

20

416,000

1976

23,600

1000

4.4%

24.0%

21

452,000

S E R V E

24%

OF

T A B

B Y

1976

�MEMBERSHIP

GAIN

% GAIN

% TAB

STAFF

OPERATING
BUDGET

19.4

15

$224.00

1968

16,000

1969

17,000

1,000

6.2

20.5

16

257.000

1970

18,000

1,000

5.9

21.8

17

285.000

1971

19,100

1,100

6.1

22.1

18

315.000

1972

20,200

1,100

5.8

22.9

19

346.000

1973

21,400

1,200

5.9

23.6

20

379.000

1974

22,600

1,200

5.6

24.2

21

415.000

1975

23,800

1,200

5.3

24.9

22

452.000

1976

25,000

1,200

5.0

25.4

23

492.000

SERVE 25% OF TAB BY 1976

�Cf/ICKASAW COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
SCOUT SERl/ICE CENTER, 3:30 P.M., SEPTEMBER 24, 196S

I.

PRESENT: R. M. Hunt

Gene. Pearson
Tom Wet&amp;Hon
Hanotd Steinkamp
II.

Ro£p/i Hatley

Melvin Humptieys
Wayne Vgeatt
Jones Huskey

BOfPOWER ' 76:

Arf-cemA't'u.pentitled "ftoypowesi '76" outlining features o£ the, national
long range program was shown.
111.

WORK OUTLINE FOR COMMITTEE:

Cnat/tman Mac tfunt outlined the. wonk to be done by the, committee, announcing
4ub-comnitte.e. ckaitvm&amp;n at&gt;

fallow.

ip Study
-----------------Organization and Manpowet ---------O^lce, Study
----------------------Camp S^udif
------------------------finance.
----------------------------

6. T. Raney, Tom Weinman 6 Gene,
Hatiold SteJJikamp
Gejotye. Thoma&amp;on
Ralph Hatle.y, Medu-tn Humphste.y&amp;
Wayne. Pye&amp;tt

He, stated that the, entOie. n,e,pottf. would be. submitted to the. council execattue
boatd fan. approval when completed.

It should the.n be. pointed in an atjfaactive.

bsiochuAe. fax. pnopeJi di&amp;^emination.
!(/.

REPORT OF MEMBERSHIP STOW COMMITTEE:
Tom Wet£man *.epo-t£ed on the. wonk. which had been done by the, membesuhip ttudy
cowmcttee. ?KeJtimina&gt;ig &amp;e.cornrnendation&amp; fan. pnoje.cte.d membeA&amp;hip and unit gtwwth
through 1976 wesie. given and the, committee, decided to make fiustthen. &amp;tudy on the&amp;e
fiecontnendation* . A copy ojj tkiA fiepont -U attached to the minute*.

I/.

INNER- CIT/ INFORMATION:
The Scout Executive explained that the dutxict&amp; oniented to Neg^io institution* which ptie&amp;ently overlay otken, di&amp;txict should be pha&amp;ed out dusting the
long nange plan pcniod. Special emphasis should be given to the innen.-city an.ea
in onden, to scn.vc a highen. percentage o$ available boys.

�I/I.

CAMP FACILITIES:

Me£uui Humpftfce#4 4toted that memfoeAA o^ kiA cotfmtttee had ucd-cted the
couwcuZ'4 camp jjaoctcttei ^.w o/Ldw. io become tfamitufz. wtcdi t/ie pwpeA&amp;j.
VII.

SCHEDULE OF COMMITTEE:

Ckaiwnan. Hunt &amp;cud tkat the. cotrmcttee MU b&amp;kind AJI ww/tfe expected -to be
accompanied at t^u time but that meetcng^ woatd be mote ^teqaent '61
t/iat the completed ^epo^it be teadtf ecM^t/ -en ?969.
iubmctted,

�P R E L I M I N A R Y
AGE

7965
a e -1 A 1

CUBS

5-70

scours

77-73

27,349

EXPLORERS 14-16

26,407

TOTAL

52,497

CUSS

scours

5-70

24. S

11-13

27.6

EXPLORERS 14-16
TOTAL
CUBS

£0,747

4.7
79.7

7969
25,675
27,455
26,540
52,703
27.9

1970
25,477

7977
AVAILABLE
37,767

27,429

27,957

26,706

27,797

52,672

56,345

29.7

25.7

30.2

4^ • 2^

c

20.5

4 .5
27.6

8-10

7,674

5,000

5,300

11-13

7,569

7/ , 7
Q/l/1
UW

« ,300

EXPLORERS 14-16

7,077

SCOUTS

TOTAL
PACKS

B-10

7,300

77,025

77,900

236

245

255

292

304

TROOPS

77-73

275

POSTS

74-76

97

TOTAL

605

97
634

27.9

7972

soy CROP

7973

7974

7976,

33,507

35,777

36,575

35,370

25,433

25,525

29,272

29,777

30,743

27,653

27,992

25,352

29,735

29,57^

90,327

92,525

95,673

95,327*

25.3

25.4

9K
t o . 9L

Qf
ft
2S.£

32.2

32.7

33.3

34.7

6\* • i/5

•7/. :&gt;a

7.9

5.4

22.9

23.3

23.6

9,500

70,000

70,400

70,500

9,300

9,600

9,900

70,300 (

7,900

2,700

2,300

2,5001

20,700

27,700

255

295

22,600
305

23,600
375

BE StRl/EP
25.6

30.7

37.3

5.5

6.7

27.7
22,4
DUMBER TO BE SERfEfl

S,700

9,700

5,600

5,900

7,500

7975

37,775

9 ^ /I

7,725

76,260

PERCENT TO

W O R K S H E E T

7,700

75,500
79,700
UWIT PROJECTION
265
275

24.0

376

329

342

357

369

357

706

775

723

737

739

74S

755

665

696

727

755

797

522

i
554 iit
i

Cff A R T

A

;

/
f' ',
i

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="261">
                <text>Chickasaw Council Executive Board</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="262">
                <text>Chickasaw Council, BSA</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="263">
                <text>Contains Reports of Committees, Annual Reports, Recharters, and Minutes</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    <elementContainer>
      <element elementId="1">
        <name>Text</name>
        <description>Any textual data included in the document</description>
        <elementTextContainer>
          <elementText elementTextId="1131">
            <text>CHICKASAW COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA&#13;
LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE&#13;
AUGUST 5, 1969, 4:00 P. M.&#13;
SCOUT SERVICE CENTER&#13;
PRESENT:&#13;
R. M. Hunt, Ralph Hatley, George Thomason, Harold Steinkamp and&#13;
Jones Iluskey.&#13;
FINAL APPROVAL OF GOALS:&#13;
Mac Hunt stated that he had some concern about the figures being used for available&#13;
boys. Since the last meeting, he had reviewed this information with Tom Wellman&#13;
and was convinced that the information being used was the best available.&#13;
In the previous meeting some members of the regional long range committee had&#13;
questioned whether the 1976 membership goal for the council had been set high&#13;
enough since the percentage of available boys served would be lower than the&#13;
regional and national record. It was explained that the percentage of growth for&#13;
the council would be much greater than either the region or national council. It&#13;
was also pointed out that the projected growth would be greater than for any eight&#13;
year period in the council's history. The committee members present agreed that&#13;
the projections should remain the same as previously approved by the committee.&#13;
APPROVAL OF PLAN:&#13;
It was announced that the long range plan would be presented to the executive board&#13;
for approval on August 14.&#13;
Respectfully submitted,&#13;
Jones B. Huskey&#13;
Secretary&#13;
CHICKASAW COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA&#13;
MINUTES OF LONG RANG PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING&#13;
JULY 22, 1969 - 12:00 NOON - HOLIDAY INN&#13;
McLean Street&#13;
PRESENT:&#13;
Don Flanders&#13;
Cecil B*Mer&#13;
Snead Clift&#13;
A. L. Jung&#13;
R. M. Hunt&#13;
Wayne Pyeatt&#13;
Harold Steinkamp&#13;
Billy Bamble&#13;
Jones Huskey&#13;
Ralph Hatley&#13;
George Thomason&#13;
Bill Cowan&#13;
Tom Wellman&#13;
CHICKASAW COUNCIL LONG RANGE PROJECTIONS:&#13;
Mac Hunt, Chairman of the Council Long Range Planning Committee, requested that&#13;
long range projection sheets prepared by sub-committees be passed out and reviewed.&#13;
These projections were through the year 1976 and on membership, units, personnel,&#13;
camping and finance. It was agreed that these projections should be presented to&#13;
the executive board for approval.&#13;
SLIDE PRESENTATION:&#13;
Mac Hunt presented a group of slides with appropriate narration to give highlights&#13;
of the council's long range plan. These were presented to the committee for approval&#13;
before submitting to the board. The committee accepted this method of presentation.&#13;
COMMENTS FROM REGIONAL COMMITTEE:&#13;
Cecil Bower, Chairman of the Region Five Long Range Planning Committee explained that&#13;
his committee was meeting with the Chickasaw Council committee to review progress and&#13;
exchange ideas.&#13;
Regional committeemen complimented Mr. Hunt and his committee for the work which had&#13;
been done and made comments including the following suggestions:&#13;
- Sales committee needed to sell plan.&#13;
- How to accomplish must be In writing as well as what to accomplish.&#13;
- Quality items should be included such as National Standard Units and&#13;
Trained Leaders.&#13;
- Matching funds for personnel are available from the national council.&#13;
- Any problems with united fund will be lessened when their key personnel&#13;
know our long range plans.&#13;
- Our board members need to help united fund more.&#13;
- Involve key people from major united fund contributors in Scouting.&#13;
- Formulate program to inform S.U.N. board people of our plans.&#13;
Respectfully submitted,&#13;
'Jones B. Huskey&#13;
Scout Executive&#13;
MEETING WITH DISTRICT CHAIRMEN&#13;
SCOTTT SERVICE CENTER&#13;
APRIL 30, 1969, 7:30 P.M.&#13;
PRESENT:&#13;
Clay Shelton, Vaughan Dow, Ma.nley Cox, Larry Hilbun, Charles T)inkins,&#13;
Harold Steinkamp, Billy Gamble, Jones Huskey&#13;
INVOCATION:&#13;
The meeting was opened with a prayer by Billy Gamble,&#13;
DISTRICT REALIGNMENT ;&#13;
President Steinkamp presented recommendations for district realignment&#13;
which vere being made by the long range planning committee. All&#13;
those present enthusiastically endorsed the plan. Dr. Dink ins felt that&#13;
this would be particularity helpful in the inner-city area. All district&#13;
chairmen expressed their eagerness to cooperate to the fullest extent in&#13;
the execution of this realignment program. Copy of the realignment proposal&#13;
is attached to the minutes,&#13;
STTSTPTNTNG&#13;
Sustaining membership progress and follow up plans were discussed.&#13;
Each chairman thought his district would meet its goal.&#13;
BOYFOWER '76&#13;
Boypower '76 accomplishments were reviewed Indicating that the council&#13;
was on target on all goals and most districts were on target, or real close.&#13;
GAFF&#13;
President Steinkamp gave a report on progress being made on camp&#13;
development projects,&#13;
NATIONAL JAMBOREE&#13;
It was reported that the council was behind schedule in filling its&#13;
quoto for the national jamboree. District chairmen were urged tc concen&#13;
trate on promotion of this event,&#13;
STAFF ORGANIZATION:&#13;
The Scout Executive reported on staff organization changes which were&#13;
taking place.&#13;
Respectfully submitted,&#13;
Jones B. Huskey&#13;
Secretary&#13;
May, 1969&#13;
CHICKASAW COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA&#13;
DISTRICT REALIGNMENT PLAN&#13;
A. SOME PROBLEMS WITH PRESENT DISTRICT .ALIGNMENT:&#13;
- Some districts are too large geographically which means district executive&#13;
travels too much.&#13;
- Districts which have a definite mixture of disadvantaged area and some more&#13;
affluent areas have neglected the poorer areas,&#13;
- The present alignment of Negro districts overlaying white districts could cause&#13;
the council embarrassment (some could classify this as segregation). This has&#13;
been a good plan during transition period but the present plan is now out of&#13;
date and expensive.&#13;
B. REALIGNMENT PLANS:&#13;
After much research and study by the Long Range Planning Comnittee the following&#13;
plan is recommended:&#13;
The proposed plan will have an advantage over the present alignment as the&#13;
proposal is strictly geographical and all districts will be integrated.&#13;
Travel required by district executives will be reduced. There will not be&#13;
duplication of service with a white man and Negro man serving the same area.&#13;
Two large inner-city districts including much of disadvantaged areas.&#13;
Would suggest at least two district executives in each inner-city district.&#13;
Northwest would include Frayser and Millington with Wolf River as south&#13;
boundry.&#13;
Southwest would include Whitehaven and three Mississippi counties with&#13;
Interstate Highway as north boundary.&#13;
The heart of the city area would be added to Northeast District.&#13;
Southeast and Eastern would remain essentially same as they are.&#13;
It would be desirable to add at least one man to staff immediately when&#13;
this plan is adopted in order to have 2 n^n i*1 each of the inner-city districts.&#13;
It is desired that immediate executive board approval be given to the district&#13;
realignment plan so that all necessary changes can be made by September 1,&#13;
1969.&#13;
LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING&#13;
SCOUT SERVICE CENTER&#13;
APRIL 24, 1969, 4:00 P.M.&#13;
PRESENT: Tom Wellman&#13;
Gene Pearson&#13;
Ralph Young&#13;
R. M. Hunt&#13;
Ralph Hatley&#13;
Melvin Humphreys&#13;
Billy Gamble&#13;
Wayne Pyeatt&#13;
Frank Simonton&#13;
Harold Steinkamp&#13;
Jones B. Huskey&#13;
GROWTH PROJECTION&#13;
Three possible projections for growth were presented for consideration of the&#13;
committee. The lowest projection would result in service to 24% of the available&#13;
boys by 1976. The highest projection would result in service to 33.3% of the total&#13;
available boys by 1976. It was moved by Harold Steinkamp and seconded by Ralph&#13;
Holley that the long range planning committee reconmend the projection which would&#13;
result in service to 25.4% of the available boys by 1976 (25,000 boys). This motion&#13;
was carried. Projection charts are attached to the minutes.&#13;
DISTRICT REALIGNMENT:&#13;
Problems with the present district alignment were discussed and several possible&#13;
realignment plans for districts were discussed. After considerable discussion it was&#13;
moved by Wayne Pyeatt and seconded by Ralph Hatley that the long range planning committee&#13;
recommend the adoption of Plan # 1, which is attached to the minutes. This motion was&#13;
carried.&#13;
SUB-COMMITTEE WORK ASSIGNMENTS:&#13;
Chairman Hunt requested sub-conmittees to complete work on the following assignments as&#13;
early as possible:&#13;
A - MEMBERSHIP&#13;
Using the recommended 25.4% projection, work out projections of&#13;
growth through 1976 for Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts and Explorers, and&#13;
also for units.&#13;
B. PERSONNEL&#13;
Determine staff to be needed (professional and office) for each year&#13;
and suggest staff organization. Determine office space and equipment&#13;
needs.&#13;
C. CAMPING&#13;
Make projections for camp participation for each year and study all&#13;
facilities including camp location and land needs.&#13;
D. FINANCE&#13;
Determine operational and capital financial needs for the total BOYPOWER&#13;
'76 program.&#13;
PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS - CAMPING SUB-COMMITTEE;&#13;
Melvin Humphreys presented same preliminary camping recommendations which are&#13;
attached to the minutes.&#13;
Repectfully submitted,&#13;
Jones B. Huskey&#13;
Secretary&#13;
Z6S&#13;
595&#13;
£15&#13;
/S*&#13;
90*&#13;
*l*&#13;
S6£&#13;
S6£&#13;
56£&#13;
26£&#13;
Sf£&#13;
S*£&#13;
£2£&#13;
&gt;l£&#13;
2££&#13;
f0£&#13;
in&#13;
952&#13;
9*2&#13;
522&#13;
102&#13;
»02&#13;
612&#13;
sum&#13;
7TKU&#13;
669*5 £'5 12* 590*91&#13;
Z6S*S 0*1 621*1 **2'SI&#13;
*I2*5 I'll 60*'l SH**I&#13;
W* £-11 9*2*1 9&lt;tt*2l&#13;
150'* 1* // 02**/i&#13;
1/0'* il'6 **0'| 60**ll&#13;
96Z*£ 16 "2 262 56£*0I&#13;
22f'£ !£•*- |*|- £0| '0|&#13;
901 *£ 11' I 211 **2*0I ^ ^ » BT^IP r T &lt;r v v&#13;
Z/9*£ |£'£ £*£ 2£r0|&#13;
*!*'£ t/'9 519 m'6&#13;
S0Z4£ 10'* £££ Ul'i&#13;
US'£ t*'2 012 6/1 '*&#13;
S2£*£ tZ'2- £*2* 609*»&#13;
*//'£ *2'// 26« 251 *&gt;&#13;
6*/*2 12 '/ *££ 096 *Z&#13;
99**2 I*/ *I6 22**Z&#13;
/I0'2 19V £9^ 105*9&#13;
191*2 I6'0I 165 5*0*9&#13;
Z26'/ M'/l /If &gt;***S&#13;
62/*l I2'|- 65 - Z£9**&#13;
**/'/ IT!- 26 - 96Z*t&#13;
m'/ m**&#13;
ao wvo&#13;
£/?&#13;
Z/6&#13;
W&#13;
52Z&#13;
IU&#13;
669&#13;
169&#13;
*95&#13;
295&#13;
155&#13;
1*5&#13;
5**&#13;
f$*&#13;
Uf&#13;
iff&#13;
/tt&#13;
fj#&gt;&#13;
m&#13;
in&#13;
2*1&#13;
fll&#13;
*i&#13;
II&#13;
*32t07a*3&#13;
IS**/&#13;
Oll'i&#13;
909 '9&#13;
6£l*9&#13;
ZS9'5&#13;
6/*'£&#13;
/«!'$&#13;
*6t-S&#13;
602*5&#13;
600*5&#13;
ft/'t&#13;
102**&#13;
0£2'*&#13;
*02'*&#13;
09Z**&#13;
6/***&#13;
662**&#13;
20/'£&#13;
0*9 *f&#13;
62*'£&#13;
f06*2&#13;
£51*£&#13;
055 '£&#13;
SlflCQS&#13;
tu't&#13;
ZSI*Z&#13;
I9**9&#13;
2*1*5&#13;
5*0*5&#13;
If 2 '5&#13;
/«'*&#13;
5****&#13;
£Z*'*&#13;
2Z5**&#13;
£*5**&#13;
925'*&#13;
«r*&#13;
*6*'£&#13;
£55 '£&#13;
*£0'£&#13;
«f'2&#13;
209*2&#13;
0&gt;l*2&#13;
rn'i&#13;
119*1&#13;
*95'l&#13;
952*1&#13;
sana&#13;
1961&#13;
mi&#13;
996*&#13;
5961&#13;
*96I&#13;
£961&#13;
296*&#13;
*961&#13;
0961&#13;
6561&#13;
956I0&#13;
Z56I&#13;
956*&#13;
5561&#13;
*56|&#13;
£56*&#13;
256*&#13;
1561&#13;
0561&#13;
6*6*&#13;
1*6*&#13;
£*6*&#13;
9*6'&#13;
7IDWOD WVSVOKOIWD&#13;
MEMBERSHIP GAIN % GAIN % TAB STAFF OPERATING BUDGET&#13;
1968&#13;
1969&#13;
1970&#13;
1971&#13;
1972&#13;
1973&#13;
1974&#13;
1975&#13;
1976&#13;
16,000&#13;
17,200&#13;
18,700&#13;
20,400&#13;
22,400&#13;
24,700&#13;
27,300&#13;
30,000&#13;
32,842&#13;
1200&#13;
1500&#13;
1700&#13;
2000&#13;
2300&#13;
2600&#13;
2700&#13;
2842&#13;
7.5%&#13;
8.7%&#13;
9.0%&#13;
9.8%&#13;
10.2%&#13;
10.5%&#13;
9.8%&#13;
9.5%&#13;
19.4%&#13;
20.8%&#13;
22.6%&#13;
23.6%&#13;
25.4%&#13;
27.3%&#13;
29.4%&#13;
31.3%&#13;
33.3%&#13;
15&#13;
16&#13;
18&#13;
20&#13;
22&#13;
24&#13;
26&#13;
28&#13;
31&#13;
$224,000&#13;
257,000&#13;
300,000&#13;
347,000&#13;
394,000&#13;
446,000&#13;
500,000&#13;
555,000&#13;
630,000&#13;
S E R V E 33.3% 0 F T A B B Y 1976&#13;
MEMBERSHIP GAIN % GAIN % TAB STAFF OPERATING BUDGET&#13;
1968&#13;
1969&#13;
1970&#13;
1971&#13;
1972&#13;
1973&#13;
1974&#13;
1975&#13;
1976&#13;
16,000&#13;
17,000&#13;
17,900&#13;
18,800&#13;
19,700&#13;
20,700&#13;
21,700&#13;
22,600&#13;
23,600&#13;
1000&#13;
900&#13;
900&#13;
900&#13;
1000&#13;
1000&#13;
900&#13;
1000&#13;
6.2%&#13;
5.3%&#13;
5.0%&#13;
4.8%&#13;
5.1%&#13;
4.8%&#13;
4.1%&#13;
4.4%&#13;
19.4%&#13;
20.5%&#13;
21.6%&#13;
21.8%&#13;
22.4%&#13;
22.9%&#13;
23.3%&#13;
23.6%&#13;
24.0%&#13;
15&#13;
16&#13;
17&#13;
17&#13;
18&#13;
19&#13;
20&#13;
20&#13;
21&#13;
$224,000&#13;
257,000&#13;
285,000&#13;
300,000&#13;
331,000&#13;
362,000&#13;
396,000&#13;
416,000&#13;
452,000&#13;
S E R V E 2 4 % OF T A B B Y 1976&#13;
1968&#13;
1969&#13;
1970&#13;
1971&#13;
1972&#13;
1973&#13;
1974&#13;
MEMBERSHIP&#13;
16,000&#13;
17,000&#13;
18,000&#13;
19,100&#13;
20,200&#13;
21,400&#13;
22,600&#13;
GAIN&#13;
1,000&#13;
1,000&#13;
1,100&#13;
1,100&#13;
1,200&#13;
1,200&#13;
% GAIN&#13;
6.2&#13;
5.9&#13;
6.1&#13;
5.8&#13;
5.9&#13;
5.6&#13;
% TAB&#13;
19.4&#13;
20.5&#13;
21.8&#13;
22.1&#13;
22.9&#13;
23.6&#13;
24.2&#13;
STAFF&#13;
15&#13;
16&#13;
17&#13;
18&#13;
19&#13;
20&#13;
21&#13;
OPERATING&#13;
BUDGET&#13;
$224.00&#13;
257.000&#13;
285.000&#13;
315.000&#13;
346.000&#13;
379.000&#13;
415.000&#13;
1975 23,800 1,200 5.3 24.9 22 452.000&#13;
1976 25,000 1,200 5.0 25.4 23 492.000&#13;
SERVE 25% OF TAB BY 1976&#13;
Cf/ICKASAW COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA&#13;
LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING&#13;
SCOUT SERl/ICE CENTER, 3:30 P.M., SEPTEMBER 24, 196S&#13;
I. PRESENT: R. M. Hunt Ro£p/i Hatley&#13;
Gene. Pearson Melvin Humptieys&#13;
Tom Wet&amp;Hon Wayne Vgeatt&#13;
Hanotd Steinkamp Jones Huskey&#13;
II. BOfPOWER ' 76:&#13;
A rf-cemA't'u.p entitled "ftoypowesi '76" outlining features o£ the, national&#13;
long range program was shown.&#13;
111. WORK OUTLINE FOR COMMITTEE:&#13;
Cnat/tman Mac tfunt outlined the. wonk to be done by the, committee, announcing&#13;
4ub-comnitte.e. ckaitvm&amp;n at&gt; fallow.&#13;
ip Study ------------------ 6. T. Raney, Tom Weinman 6 Gene,&#13;
Organization and Manpowet ---------- Hatiold SteJJikamp&#13;
O^lce, Study ----------------------- Gejotye. Thoma&amp;on&#13;
Camp S^udif ------------------------- Ralph Hatle.y, Medu-tn Humphste.y&amp;&#13;
finance. ---------------------------- Wayne. Pye&amp;tt&#13;
He, stated that the, entOie. n,e,pottf. would be. submitted to the. council execattue&#13;
boatd fan. approval when completed. It should the.n be. pointed in an atjfaactive.&#13;
bsiochuAe. fax. pnopeJi di&amp;^emination.&#13;
!(/. REPORT OF MEMBERSHIP STOW COMMITTEE:&#13;
Tom Wet£man *.epo-t£ed on the. wonk. which had been done by the, membesuhip ttudy&#13;
cowmcttee. ?KeJtimina&gt;ig &amp;e.cornrnendation&amp; fan. pnoje.cte.d membeA&amp;hip and unit gtwwth&#13;
through 1976 wesie. given and the, committee, decided to make fiustthen. &amp;tudy on the&amp;e&#13;
fiecontnendation* . A copy ojj tkiA fiepont -U attached to the minute*.&#13;
I/. INNER- CIT/ INFORMATION:&#13;
The Scout Executive explained that the dutxict&amp; oniented to Neg^io institution*&#13;
which ptie&amp;ently overlay otken, di&amp;txict should be pha&amp;ed out dusting the&#13;
long nange plan pcniod. Special emphasis should be given to the innen.-city an.ea&#13;
in onden, to scn.vc a highen. percentage o$ available boys.&#13;
I/I. CAMP FACILITIES:&#13;
Me£uui Humpftfce#4 4toted that memfoeAA o^ kiA cotfmtttee had ucd-cted the&#13;
couwcuZ'4 camp jjaoctcttei ^.w o/Ldw. io become tfamitufz. wtcdi t/ie pwpeA&amp;j.&#13;
VII. SCHEDULE OF COMMITTEE:&#13;
Ckaiwnan. Hunt &amp;cud tkat the. cotrmcttee MU b&amp;kind AJI ww/tfe expected -to be&#13;
accompanied at t^u time but that meetcng^ woatd be mote ^teqaent '61&#13;
t/iat the completed ^epo^it be teadtf ecM^t/ -en ?969.&#13;
iubmctted,&#13;
P R E L I M I N A R Y W O R K S H E E T&#13;
AGE&#13;
CUBS 5-70&#13;
scours 77-73&#13;
EXPLORERS 14-16&#13;
TOTAL&#13;
CUSS 5-70&#13;
scours 11-13&#13;
EXPLORERS 14-16&#13;
TOTAL&#13;
CUBS 8-10&#13;
SCOUTS 11-13&#13;
EXPLORERS 14-16&#13;
TOTAL&#13;
PACKS B-10&#13;
TROOPS 77-73&#13;
POSTS 74-76&#13;
TOTAL&#13;
7965&#13;
a e -1 A 1&#13;
£0,747&#13;
27,349&#13;
26,407&#13;
52,497&#13;
24. S&#13;
27.6&#13;
4 . 7&#13;
79.7&#13;
7,674&#13;
7,569&#13;
7,077&#13;
76,260&#13;
236&#13;
275&#13;
97&#13;
605&#13;
7969&#13;
25,675&#13;
27,455&#13;
26,540&#13;
52,703&#13;
27.9&#13;
25.7&#13;
4^ •2^&#13;
20.5&#13;
5,000&#13;
7 Q/l/1 / , 7 U W&#13;
7,725&#13;
77,025&#13;
245&#13;
292&#13;
97&#13;
634&#13;
1970&#13;
25,477&#13;
27,429&#13;
26,706&#13;
52,672&#13;
29.7&#13;
30.2&#13;
4 c .5&#13;
27.6&#13;
5,300&#13;
«,390 ^0 /I&#13;
7,300&#13;
77,900&#13;
255&#13;
304&#13;
706&#13;
665&#13;
7977&#13;
AVAILABLE&#13;
37,767&#13;
27,957&#13;
27,797&#13;
56,345 PERCENT TO&#13;
27.9&#13;
30.7&#13;
5.5&#13;
2 7 . 7&#13;
DUMBER TO&#13;
S,700&#13;
7972 soy CROP&#13;
37,775&#13;
25,433&#13;
27,653&#13;
BE StRl/EP&#13;
25.6&#13;
37.3&#13;
6.7&#13;
22,4&#13;
BE SERfEfl&#13;
9,700&#13;
5,600 5,900&#13;
7,500 7,700&#13;
75,500 79,700&#13;
UWIT PROJECTION&#13;
265&#13;
376&#13;
775&#13;
696&#13;
275&#13;
329&#13;
723&#13;
727&#13;
7973&#13;
33,507&#13;
25,525&#13;
27,992&#13;
90,327&#13;
25.3&#13;
32.2&#13;
\6* • i5/&#13;
22.9&#13;
9,500&#13;
9,300&#13;
7,900&#13;
20,700&#13;
255&#13;
342&#13;
737&#13;
755&#13;
7974&#13;
35,777&#13;
29,272&#13;
25,352&#13;
92,525&#13;
25.4&#13;
32.7&#13;
•/7. :a&gt;&#13;
23.3&#13;
70,000&#13;
9,600&#13;
2,700&#13;
27,700&#13;
295&#13;
357&#13;
739&#13;
797&#13;
7975&#13;
36,575&#13;
29,777&#13;
29,735&#13;
95,673&#13;
t9Ko . 9L&#13;
33.3&#13;
7.9&#13;
23.6&#13;
70,400&#13;
9,900&#13;
2,300&#13;
22,600&#13;
305&#13;
369&#13;
74S&#13;
522&#13;
C f f A R T&#13;
;&#13;
7976,&#13;
35,370&#13;
30,743&#13;
29,57^&#13;
95,327*&#13;
2QSf .£ft&#13;
34.7&#13;
5.4&#13;
24.0&#13;
70,500&#13;
70,300(&#13;
2,5001&#13;
23,600&#13;
375&#13;
357&#13;
755&#13;
i&#13;
554 iit&#13;
i&#13;
A&#13;
/&#13;
f' ',&#13;
i</text>
          </elementText>
        </elementTextContainer>
      </element>
      <element elementId="53">
        <name>Note</name>
        <description>Note for historical disclaimer</description>
        <elementTextContainer>
          <elementText elementTextId="2933">
            <text>&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Please note that these documents are presented as they existed in their original form for historical accuracy. This document may contain racial or culturally insensitive language. Since the beginning in 1916, Scouting in Memphis has been regarded as a pioneer in interracial Scouting and equality; however, it still existed within the context of a segregated South. The material reflects the culture and context in which it was created and does not reflect the views and principles of the Kia Kima Alumni Association, the Chickasaw Council, or the Scouting movement.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</text>
          </elementText>
        </elementTextContainer>
      </element>
    </elementContainer>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1079">
              <text>1968-1969</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1080">
              <text>1968-1969 Chickasaw Council Long Range Planning Committee Minutes</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1081">
              <text>Chickasaw Council, BSA</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="48">
          <name>Source</name>
          <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1083">
              <text>Chickasaw Council, BSA</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1114">
              <text>Duane Klink &amp; Chuck Schadrack</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="11">
      <name>Minutes</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
